My latest reads:
Marie-Claire Blais, Soifs.
This novel has been translated into English as : These Festive Nights ; into Spanish as : Sed ; and into German as Drei Nächte, drei Tage
It is said that when she started writing this novel although Marie-Claire Blais expected that it would eventually grow into a trilogy or something like that, she definitely had not foreseen that it would turn into a decalogy and that it would keep her busy for more than 25 years.
Although it is the first part of this monumental piece of literature, Soifs can be read on its own. But since it does not recount a particular story and does not really develop around a givent plot, it is quite hard to summarize. The action takes place in the 1990’s, on an island located somewhere between the Atlantic ocean and the Caribean sea and introduces us to a pléiade of mostly non native people living or staying on this island. Narrated at the third person singular, yet espousing a form akin to stream of consciousness, the whole novel is written in one go (no paragraph, no chapter, and with just the occasional period to pause). Deployed along a somewhat circular narrative line and alternating point of views, it provides a sort of kaleidoscopic entry into each character inner thoughts. As the French title indicates Soifs is about thirst, longing, or dying, in their many variations. It gently takes us into a whirlpool of lives at a given time and place and leaves us with an intuitive perception of how transient things are. Remarquably well done and well written.
In the mean time, I have been breakfasting with Coriolanus by William Shakespeare.
The story takes place in the 5th century BC and tells of a Roman general named Gaius Marcius (later renamed Coriolanus), whose longstanding exploits and service to the nation pave the way for him to endorse a career in politics. It is obvious from the start that he is no politician, and he does not seem to crave power. Nevertheless, even if Coriolanus does not possess the skills for the job being pressed by his peers and family to embark on that journey, he goes for it. Of course he does the wrong things, and soon he finds himself in trouble. In a reverse situation, after befriending his formal foes, he becomes their ally and turns against Rome. Of course, all this ends tragically, but the play ends quite abruptly, leaving us to wonder what would come next. Overall, this play left me rather confused. Thinking about it over and over again, it is clear that my reading was greatly impacted by the ambivalent behavior of the main character. I could not make up my mind about his motivations, about why he did this or that, etc. One of the consequence to this is that there are many ways to interpret this play. I don’t know which I would prefer, but one thing is certain; once again dear Shakespeare has manage to feed my thoughts about humankind.